Canada passed a carbon tax that will give most Canadians more money
By rebating the revenue to households, disposable income rises, which can be a boon for the Canadian economy Last week, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act , Canada will implement a revenue-neutral carbon tax starting in 2019, fulfilling a campaign pledge he made in 2015 . Starting next spring, itll no longer be free to pollute in Canada. Were putting a price on pollution in provinces that dont yet have a plan to fight climate change. More on our plan to cut pollution, grow the economy & create jobs: https://t.co/VjCNOOKLVB #EnvironmentEconomy pic.twitter.com/b4wFc17Qte The federal carbon pollution price will start low at $20 per ton in 2019, rising at $10 per ton per year until reaching $50 per ton in 2022. The carbon tax will stay at that level unless the legislation is revisited and revised. This is a somewhat modest carbon tax after all, the social cost of carbon is many times higher but its a higher carbon price than has been implemented in most countries . Moreover, a carbon tax doesnt necessarily have to reflect the social cost of carbon. The question is whether it will be sufficiently high to meet the countrys climate targets. The Preamble in the Act is worth reading. It begins by noting there is broad scientific consensus that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global climate change (this is somewhat understated carbon pollution is the dominant factor ). It also notes that Canada is already feeling the impacts of climate change through factors like coastal erosion, thawing permafrost, increases in heat waves, droughts and flooding, and related risks to critical infrastructures and food security. The Preamble also notes that in 1992, Canada signed the UNFCCC whose objectives include the stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, and that Canada ratified the Paris Agreement , whose aims include limiting global warming to less than 2C above pre-industrial temperatures . Canadas Paris commitment requires cutting its carbon pollution by 30% below 2005 levels by 2030. Prior to the implementation of the carbon tax, its policies were rated Highly Insufficient to meet that goal. Instead Canadas emissions were on track to fall only about 4% below 2005 levels by 2030. So, the carbon tax is an important policy to close that gap. Several Canadian provinces have already implemented or plan to implement carbon pricing systems. British Columbia, Alberta, and Quebec already have such systems in place; the Canadian government noted that these provinces were among the top performers in GDP growth across Canada in 2017. Provinces whose carbon prices meet the federal standards are already in compliance, so the new law wont apply to them. Several other provinces (Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador) have planned or proposed carbon pricing systems that will meet the federal requirements. The federal carbon tax will be applied to the remaining provinces. A $20/ton carbon tax translates into a 16.6 cent per gallon surcharge on gasoline. So, in 2022, the $50/ton carbon tax will increase Canadian gasoline prices by about 42 cents per gallon (11 cents per liter). For comparison, the average price of gasoline in Canada is $1.43 per liter , so that would be about an 8% gasoline price increase in 2022. The price of coal would more than double, with a carbon tax surcharge of about $100 per ton in 2022. Natural gas prices will rise by about 10 cents per cubic meter in 2022 compared to current prices of around 13 cents per cubic meter about a 75% increase. This will increase demand for cheaper carbon-free electricity. However, Canada already supplies about 60% of its electricity through hydroelectric generation and 16% from nuclear only about 2025% comes from fossil fuels. For that reason, only 11% of Canadas carbon pollution comes from generating electricity. The industrial sector is responsible for the biggest chunk of Canadian carbon pollution (40%). It will not be subjected to the carbon tax, but rather to an Output-Based Allocations system (similar to cap and trade). One key component of the federal carbon tax is that its revenue-neutral, similar to the policy proposal from Citizens Climate Lobby . All the taxed money will be distributed back to the provinces from which they were generated. The provinces will in turn rebate about 90% the revenues back to individual taxpayers. The rebates are anticipated to exceed the increased energy costs for about 70% of Canadian households. For example, a Manitoba family will receive a $336 rebate in 2019 compared to its increased costs of $232. A similar family in Saskatchewan will receive $598 compared to its higher costs of $403. In Ontario , families will receive $300 to offset its $244 in carbon taxes. And in New Brunswick a $248 rebate more than offsets the average household cost of $202. The rebates will more than double by 2022 as the carbon tax rises, and the net financial benefit to households will grow over time . 6. And more most households, rebates will larger than their carbon pricing costs. Households will see net gains. pic.twitter.com/ThfWoiXY85 The remaining 10% of the tax revenue will provide support to particularly affected sectors like schools, hospitals, small businesses, colleges, and indigenous communities. Diesel-fired electricity generation in remote communities and aviation fuel in the territories will receive full exemption from the carbon tax. The Canadian government recognizes that climate change impacts are expensive : Climate change has already had financial impacts on Canada, and these costs will only continue to grow. In 2016, it was estimated that larger and more intense weather events will cost the federal Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements program around $902 million each year. The health costs of extreme weather are estimated to be over $1.6 billion a year. The cost of property damages from climate change averaged $405 million per year between 1983 and 2008, but have risen dramatically to $1.8 billion a year since 2009. That number is expected to grow as high as $43 billion by 2050. It would be cheaper to reduce those costs by slowing global warming than to pay for increasingly extreme weather damages. With this carbon tax, Canada is recognizing that reality, and in fact is offsetting the financial impact on its taxpayers by returning the revenue to households. This is an approach that studies have shown can boost the economy because disposable income rises due to the rebate exceeding increased energy costs for 70% of Canadians. Justin Trudeau has shown great climate leadership in following through with this carbon tax. Hopefully Canadians will reward him in next years elections. Note: this will be our final entry on Climate Consensus - the 97%. The Guardian has decided to discontinue its Science and Environment blogging networks. We would like to thank this great paper for hosting us over the past five years, and to our readers for making it a worthwhile and rewarding endeavor.