Becoming a halfway vegan could curb climate change, scientists claim
Scientists claim going 50 percent could curb . A new study suggests for plant-based alternatives for the next 27 years could drop emissions by 31 percent. The findings are based on agriculture and land use needed to raise livestock and grow crops. However, previous research shows alone produces more emissions than meat and dairy products combined, suggesting personal behavior may not be enough to save the planet. found meat and dairy account for 57 percent of food-based greenhouse gas emissions. The , published in the journal Nature Communications, aligns with the previous research, noting that going 50 percent vegan would reduce agriculture and land use. Study co-author Eva Wollenberg of the University of Vermont said: 'We'll need much more than 'Meatless Mondays' to reduce the global GHG emissions driving climate changeand this study shows us a path forward. 'Plant-based meats are not just a novel food product, but a critical opportunity for achieving food security and climate goals while also achieving health and biodiversity objectives worldwide. 'Such transitions are challenging and require a range of technological innovations and policy interventions.' The team looked at the global food security and environmental impacts of large-scale plant-based meat and milk consumption, considering the complexity of food systems. The authors found a 50 percent substitution scenario would substantially reduce the mounting impacts of food systems on the natural environment by 2050. These impacts included a 12 percent decline in global agricultural area, nitrogen inputs to cropland are nearly half of the projections, a 10 percent drop in worldwide water usage and a 31 percent drop in greenhouse emissions. While many countries rely on meat and dairy as major food sources, researchers said their work determined undernourishment globally would decline to 3.6 percent - reducing the number of undernourished people by 31 million. According to the study, impacts across regions could differ due to differences in population size and diets, unequal agricultural productivity, and participation in international trade of agricultural commodities. The main impacts on agricultural input use are in China and on environmental outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa and South America. These regional differences could also be used to design better interventions. 'The food sector produces roughly one-third of global greenhouse emissionsand has been notoriously difficult to de-carbonize,' said Wollenberg. 'Given the magnitude of benefits we show from substituting meat with plant-based alternatives for global sustainability, climate action, and human health, this research provides important food for thought for consumers, food producers, and policymakers.'