Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett has no ‘firm views’ on climate change
You know, Im certainly not a scientist, Judge Barrett told the Senate Judiciary Committee, when asked about climate change Supreme court nominee Amy Coney Barrett has said that she has no firm views on climate change because she is not a scientist , during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing this week. Judge Barrett returned to Capitol Hill for a third day on Wednesday as senators dug into the conservative nominees stances on the Affordable Care Act, the landmark abortion ruling Roe v. Wade , and potentially a disputed presidential election. Judge Barrett expertly deflected some lines of questioning, insisting she would bring no personal agenda to the court but decide cases as they come". On Tuesday, Republican Senator John Kennedy, of Louisiana, pursued questions aimed at, as he put it, showing what President Trumps nominee thought about the world. Do you have some opinions on climate change that youve thought about? Sen Kennedy asked. Judge Barrett replied: You know, Im certainly not a scientist. When asked to expand on her answer, she continued: I mean, Ive read things about climate change. I would not say that I have firm views on it. The well-worn Republican talking point of Im not a scientist has allowed a host of elected officials to equivocate on the scientific consensus on climate change, despite polls that show most Americans accept the reality of the crisis and want the government to take action. Some 97 per cent or more of climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities, NASA reports. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, Florida Governor Rick Scott, and former House Speaker John Boehner, all have all made similar not a scientist pitches when asked about the climate crisis. Michael McKenna, a Republican energy lobbyist, previously told the New York Times that it was the dumbest answer Ive ever heard. He added: Using that logic would disqualify politicians from voting on anything. Most politicians arent scientists, but they vote on science policy. They have opinions on Ebola, but theyre not epidemiologists. They shape highway and infrastructure laws, but theyre not engineers. Judge Barrett has a slim judiciary record on environmental issues, and a question on climate change did not come up after she was nominated to the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit by President Trump in 2017. The judges conservative views are at odds with the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the liberal icon who she will replace. She would be Mr Trumps third justice and her ascension is expected to tip the court 6-3 to the right. AP contributed to this report Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies Getty Images Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. Log in New to The Independent? Or if you would prefer: Want an ad-free experience? Hi {{indy.fullName}}