A leading private equity firm claimed to be a climate leader – while increasing emissions
The Carlyle Groups 2011-22 greenhouse gas footprint was roughly equivalent to Alaskas carbon bomb Willow drilling project A leading private equity firm that claims to be an industry climate leader in fact almost doubled its average annual greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel investments over the past decade, according to new research. The Carlyle Groups portfolio of fossil fuel companies emitted an estimated 277m metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 e) a measure that includes methane and other potent global-heating gases from 2011 to 2021, according to an investigation into the companys energy portfolio. The research calculates the multinationals 10-year greenhouse gas footprint to be roughly equivalent to the carbon bomb that Alaskas Willow arctic drilling project is to emit over its decades-long operation, and would take an estimated 4.6bn new trees a decade to remove from the atmosphere. The new research, by the Private Equity Climate Risks project, calculated Carlyles greenhouse gas footprint using an industry-designed tool developed by the Initiative Climat International (iCI) to document direct and indirect emissions by private equity firms having first verified which oil, gas and coal companies they back, own or invest in through publicly available information. Carlyles investment portfolio contributes substantially to the global climate crisis and inflicts environmental harms most commonly in areas with large proportions of low-income and Black and brown households, according to the report, which calls on lawmakers to close regulatory loopholes and require greater transparency. Despite its public statements to the contrary, Carlyle is a driving force behind climate change through its substantial financing of greenhouse gas emitting sectors, said Oscar Valdes Viera, co-author and research manager at the Americans for Financial Reform education fund. Without meaningful regulatory oversight, private equity firms like Carlyle will continue to get away with endangering low-income and Black and brown communities, who are at greater risk from pollution and environmental harm. The Carlyle Group vehemently disputes the findings and methodology, claiming that it is working to decarbonize conventional energy firms and its latest investments in renewables are outpacing fossil fuels. Private equity refers to an opaque form of private financing away from public, regulated markets in which funds and investors manage money for wealthy individuals and institutional investors such as university endowments and state employee pension funds. In recent years, private equity firms have become major greenhouse gas polluters, often acquiring risky oil, gas and coal projects with minimal public scrutiny or regulatory oversight which makes verifying portfolio companies and assets extremely challenging. Headquartered in Washington DC with more than 2,100 employees in 29 offices around the world, Carlyle is one of the pioneers of private equity, and at the end of 2022 had $373bn of assets under management . Carlyle is listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange, so is bound by more reporting requirements than the vast majority of private equity firms. The company began investing in renewables in 2019, and last year became the first major private equity firm to pledge to net zero emissions by 2050 (for some of its portfolio). The firm has been promoting its climate credentials by claiming to drive positive change with activities grounded in driving real emission reductions. Yet at the end of 2022, fossil fuels accounted for 94% of the companys energy portfolio, including oil and gas operations based in Texas, Massachusetts, Romania and Switzerland, according to the report The Carlyle Groups Hidden Climate Impact . For every dollar invested in renewable energy sources like solar and wind, Carlyle invests $16 in fossil fuel operations like pipelines, oil and fracking wells, and power plants, according to the consortium of researchers who told the Guardian that their calculations were based on conservative emissions estimates disclosed by the company. The private equity industry manages about $11tn globally. Asset managers and funds buy and restructure companies including startups, franchises, troubled businesses and real estate operations using their clients money. Yet unlike banks and other publicly listed companies, private equity firms are exempt from most financial disclosure rules, making it extremely difficult to track their assets or risks. It means people such as firefighters, nurses and teachers whose pensions are invested in private equity funds have little way of knowing if their retirement nest egg is financing police surveillance equipment, hospitals, leaky pipelines or coal plants. As publicly listed banks, universities and energy companies have come under growing pressure from shareholders and environmental advocates to divest from fossil fuels, rather than phasing out or retiring polluting projects, some have turned to private equity as a source of last-ditch capital. Since 2010, the industry has invested at least $1.1tn in energy projects globally mostly in companies engaged in the exploration, extraction, transportation, storage, processing and burning of oil, coal and gas. The report argues that Carlyles energy portfolio stands out as particularly dirty: between 2011 and 2021, 90% of the estimated 91 energy companies Carlyle backed were fossil fuel operations. As a result, greenhouse gas emissions from the companys energy portfolio increased by 95% on average annually, researchers found. The companys greenhouse gas footprint was about equivalent to the 2021 emissions of several large countries including Ukraine, Pakistan, Spain or Nigeria . And its paid off: despite accounting for only 6% of total assets under management, energy investments generated around half of the firms overall profits in 2022, mainly thanks to $660m from NGP Energy Capital Management also known as NGP or Natural Gas Partners. NGP, also a private equity firm, owns portions of at least a dozen fossil fuel companies, but which Carlyle does not include in its emissions disclosures , due to a different business model an accounting strategy described by some experts as slippery ethics. Carlyle has held a majority stake in NGP since 2012, according to its own Securities and Exchange Commission filing , but insists that it does not control or manage or have board oversight of the company. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion In an email to the Guardian, Carlyle rejected the reports findings, claiming that in the past three years, the company committed 60% more to renewables ($1.67bn) than fossil fuel ($1.04bn) energy deals. Carlyles differentiated approach to invest in, not divest from, the energy transition is grounded in seeking real emissions reductions within portfolio companies over the long term. The energy transition isnt solely about selecting companies that are climate leaders today, its about helping all sectors of the economy decarbonize. We are working across the sectors we invest in, including conventional energy companies, which can have some of the largest decarbonization potential, a Carlyle spokesperson said in a statement. The report also raises serious concerns about Carlyles record on environmental racism in the US, where the companys entire downstream fleet is located. Fossil fuel power plants affiliated with Carlyle or NGP are overwhelmingly located in communities with proportionately higher numbers of residents of color and low-income families than the state average. Black and Latino children are much more likely to have and die from asthma than white children, in part because of years of government and corporate environmental racism. In Connecticut, the company acquired the gas-powered Bridgeport Energy Project in 2019, where 250,000 residents, 60% of whom are Black or brown, live within a five-mile radius. Since then, the facility has on multiple occasions violated clean water standards and reporting requirements, and has received at least two enforcement actions from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . Life expectancy in the area is among the shortest in the US, according to the EPA. Carlyle is currently among the largest owners of gas-fired power capacity in the US, and almost half (47%) of its power plants have a record of environmental violations under its ownership, including facilities with repeated breaches of the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act. Despite receiving half of their net profit from NGP in 2022, they do not include those associated emissions in their data. Carlyle cannot benefit from the financial upsides of NGPs fossil fuel revenue streams without also being accountable for the environmental impacts, said Amanda Mendoza, co-author and climate researcher at the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. Our report just scratches the surface of its fossil fuel impacts. The industry has been long accused of predatory practices, loading portfolio companies with onerous fees and debt, and extreme cost-cutting measures that serve to rapidly increase short-term profits for Wall Street investors at the expense of capital improvements, maintenance, environmental safeguards and long-term stability. In one stark example, a corroded pipe triggered a fire and a series of explosions that injured five workers in the Philadelphia Energy Solutions refinery in June 2019. A few months before the accident, which sent 5,000lbs of toxic chemicals into the air of a majority-Black neighborhood in south Philadelphia, the refinery had scaled back a major maintenance project due to lack of money, according to Reuters . The maintenance cuts came as Carlyle and a group of other private equity firms took $594m in dividends and fees from 2012 to 2018 from the refinery, deepening its financial woes . The refinery eventually went into bankruptcy, leaving 1,000 workers without jobs or severance pay. Regulators under the Biden administration have been working on tightening regulations around the industrys fee structure, reporting requirements and dominance over industries. But the industry has pushed back through an army of lobbyists in Washington, most of whom previously held government jobs, according to analysis by the political finance watchdog Open Secrets . Carlyle is one of the industrys biggest spenders on Capitol Hill, investing just over $7m on lobbying in the past two years mostly to Democrats . Earlier this month, Republican members of Congress floated three new bills which would loosen existing regulations. They may call themselves a private equity company, but its clear that the Carlyle Group has become a major fossil fuel producer, said Alec Connon, co-director of Stop the Money Pipeline, a network of 240-plus organisations pushing the financial industry to align with the goals of the Paris climate agreement. If were going to tackle the climate crisis, we need to face up to the problem of private equity.