How Freight Shippers Are Trying to Get Greener
Shipping is the backbone of the global economy, carrying more than 80% of traded goods. But it also accounts for about 3% of man-made carbon dioxide emissions, with the overwhelming majority of the worlds fleet running on fossil fuel. If the sector is to decarbonize in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change, it needs to move beyond oil. 1. Which fuels could replace oil? The ship fuels that may eventually replace todays oil-derived products must produce lower (or zero) emissions, have enough power to propel gigantic vessels around the globe, and be affordable. Here are the main candidates: Methanol Pros: Can dramatically reduce emissions Has already attracted significant investment from shipping companies including A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S Is liquid at ambient temperature, helping make it relatively easy to store and handle Clean versions can be made, including using agricultural and food waste (bio methanol) or green hydrogen and CO2 (e-methanol) Cons: Limited supply of clean versions Less energy-dense than oil-derived fuel Ammonia Pros Doesnt emit carbon dioxide it contains no carbon Can be made using green hydrogen and nitrogen from the air (e-ammonia) Can also be made using natural gas (blue ammonia) Cons: Ammonia ship engines are less developed than those for methanol Potential nitrous oxide emissions, a potent greenhouse gas Toxic for people and marine life Biofuels Pros Can significantly lower carbon emissions Already produced and used in shipping Can be made from various forms of biomass Relatively easy to store and transport Can be used with existing oil-based fuel Cons: Feedstock availability is a potential barrier, particularly because of competition from other sectors, like aviation Liquefied Natural Gas Pros: Well-known, generally available, lower carbon-emitting alternative to oil-based fuel Some ships already run on LNG Theres also the potential for lower CO2 emissions from so-called bio-LNG and e-LNG Cons: Still a fossil fuel and only cuts CO2 emissions by about 20% versus oil-based marine fuel Causes emissions of methane, a super-pollutant 2. What about electricity and other clean options? Batteries lack the energy density to power massive, globe-trotting ships on long voyages. For example, a typical container ship would need the power of 10,000 Tesla S85 batteries every day. Electricity does have a role, though probably for relatively short-haul trades or powering passenger ferries. Shippers are also turning back to the wind: commodity titan Cargill Inc. plans to add so-called wing sails to some cargo vessels and another firm is working on using a giant kite to lower fuel consumption. Hydrogen fuel cells and even nuclear power are also options. Theres also the possibility of fitting ships with carbon capture technology. One such system was recently installed on an Eastern Pacific Shipping tanker. 3. Why the urgency? The International Maritime Organization, a UN agency that regulates global shipping, is currently pushing to cut greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping by at least 50% by 2050. Thats not enough of a reduction to align the industry with the Paris Agreements goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. For that, the IMO must target eliminating all GHG emissions, reaching net zero by 2050, according to the Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping. The IMOs current targets arent enforceable in themselves, unless a country puts something in its national legislation. While international shipping isnt mentioned in the Paris Agreement, the Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Center has produced a trajectory thats aligned with the treaty by applying the IPCCs global emissions pathways for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels to shipping. A legal briefing, commissioned by Transport & Environment, a non-governmental organization, concludes that the Paris Agreement imposes legal obligations on Parties to include international aviation and shipping emissions in their Nationally Determined Contributions. 4. What are the latest developments? The IMO is meeting in early July and is expected to adopt a new greenhouse-gas emissions strategy, potentially including more aggressive targets such as zero by 2050. However, no firm decisions are expected on a global carbon levy or similar hard-hitting regulation that would immediately and directly impact shippers activities. The IMO has also recently set rules on ships efficiency. Other regulators have also taken action: The European Union is including shipping in its emissions trading scheme starting next year, and the FuelEU Maritime agreement requiring emissions reductions relative to energy use has also been reached. In the US, the Inflation Reduction Act includes $3 billion of maritime-related funding, including for zero-emission port equipment, and progress is being made on Green Shipping Corridors zero emission maritime routes between two or more ports. 5. Whats the industry doing? Last year, for the first time, the majority of gross tonnage ordered was capable of running on alternative fuel including liquefied natural gas according to Clarksons. Maersk has ordered 25 ships that are capable of running on methanol, with the first making its maiden voyage this year, and its not alone. Commodities giant Trafigura Group has issued a white paper, supporting a mandatory carbon levy by 2025 to address the price gap that exists between the fuels currently used to power ships and hydrogen-derived alternatives. The Global Maritime Forum, a not-for-profit, has multiple initiatives involving large companies, including the Poseidon Principles and Sea Cargo Charter. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com 2023 Bloomberg L.P.